315: Difference between revisions

No change in size ,  8 July 2012
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


The move to use a 3” CRT rather than a 5” was to produce a “portable” oscilloscope, which the 315-D was promoted as.  With dimensions considerably smaller than the 5” models and only weighing a modest 36 pounds, it offers a lot of performance in a small package.  In [[introduced_in_1956|1956]], Tek introduced a rack mount version, the 315R.  One has to wonder what the benefit of a 3" screen is when it was packaged is a rack sized instrument.
The move to use a 3” CRT rather than a 5” was to produce a “portable” oscilloscope, which the 315-D was promoted as.  With dimensions considerably smaller than the 5” models and only weighing a modest 36 pounds, it offers a lot of performance in a small package.  In [[introduced_in_1956|1956]], Tek introduced a rack mount version, the 315R.  One has to wonder what the benefit of a 3" screen is when it was packaged as a rack sized instrument.


As with earlier 5” Tektronix scopes, the “D” suffix indicates the inclusion of  
As with earlier 5” Tektronix scopes, the “D” suffix indicates the inclusion of