31,983
edits
315: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
removable side covers as were used in the later 53x and | removable side covers as were used in the later 53x and | ||
54x, and the 55x, 56x, 57x, and 58x designs. | 54x, and the 55x, 56x, 57x, and 58x designs. | ||
Frank Hood recollects: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
We started to move into the new Sunset plant in June of 1951. In the same year I started the design work on our first compact scope, the Type 315. This instrument had several innovative features. One was a sweep circuit designed by Dick Ropequet which was several times more stable and accurate then any other then in use. With this circuit, the actual time of the sweep could be calibrated with such accuracy that we decided to start calling it a “TIME BASE”. The vertical amplifier was also more stable and accurate. A man in our test department, John Kobbe, suggested a direct coupled unblanking circuit. Another employee, Ted Goodfellow, a musician with ceramics as a hobby, suggested making a ceramic strip with silvered notches to act as insulator and support for the components. This smaller scope had less space on the front panel for the necessary controls. A Machinist, Jim Morrow, suggested combining some of the controls, by making them co-axial (that is, a shaft within a shaft and separate knobs.) We tried to purchase such controls but could find no one interesting in making them, so Jim machined sample controls. He even machined the dies to produce our own plastic knobs. All these suggestions were incorporated in the 315. Several patents were granted, which later led to a patent infringement suit which we brought against the Government, | |||
(we eventually won the law suit)." | |||
</blockquote> | |||
The move to use a 3” CRT rather than a 5” was to produce a “portable” oscilloscope, which the 315-D was promoted as. With dimensions considerably smaller than the 5” models and only weighing a modest 36 pounds, it offers a lot of performance in a small package. In [[introduced_in_1956|1956]], Tek introduced a rack mount version, the 315R. One has to wonder what the benefit of a 3" screen is when it was packaged is a rack sized instrument. | The move to use a 3” CRT rather than a 5” was to produce a “portable” oscilloscope, which the 315-D was promoted as. With dimensions considerably smaller than the 5” models and only weighing a modest 36 pounds, it offers a lot of performance in a small package. In [[introduced_in_1956|1956]], Tek introduced a rack mount version, the 315R. One has to wonder what the benefit of a 3" screen is when it was packaged is a rack sized instrument. | ||