Bad TI IC sockets: Difference between revisions

From TekWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Corrected job titles - I was never a design engineer for Tek.)
(corrections based on feedback from Håkan H)
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Bad_ti_socket_top.jpg|thumb|400px|right|Bad TI IC Socket]]
'''Texas Instruments made some bad IC sockets''' back in late 1970's.  
The TI C-95 model of socket is known to be a problem.
A typical high quality replacement would be a Mill-Max machined-pin DIP socket. 


TI made some bad IC sockets back in late 1970's.  They are easy to
DIP sockets are often problematic as instruments age.
identify since they grip the IC pins along the edge of the pin and
Gold-plated pins carrying low current in gold-plated sockets are the least problematic.
not the flat body of the pin. A typical high quality replacement would
Higher currents, such as occur in ECL logic, are more problematic.
be a Mill-Max machined pin DIP socket.  For gold pin DIPs like many of
the Tektronix custom ICs, one would choose a gold internal contact plating
and for other early non RoHS lead-tin plated ICs a similar internal
contact plating is available from some suppliers.


For the 14 pin DIP at the left, a gold part number would be mill-max 110-93-314-41-001000,
For gold pin DIPs like many of the Tektronix custom ICs, one would choose a gold internal contact plating,
a non-RoHS lead-tin part number would be mill-max 110-99-314-41-001000.  Both parts
and for other early non RoHS lead-tin plated ICs a similar internal contact plating is available from some suppliers.
are non-RoHS since the solder-tail (PCB end) is also lead-tin plated.
 
Tek issued a service note (see below) that describes a transition from the original
C93 socket design to a C95 design which was mechanically too fragile, and then
a transition to an improved version of the C93 socket design.
 
For the 14 pin DIP at the left, a gold part number would be Mill-Max 110-93-314-41-001000,
a non-RoHS lead-tin part number would be Mill-Max 110-99-314-41-001000.   
Both parts are non-RoHS since the solder-tail (PCB end) is also lead-tin plated.


Former Tek Bench Technician and Applications Engineer Jim Mauck says:
Former Tek Bench Technician and Applications Engineer Jim Mauck says:
Line 37: Line 42:
leads were gold plated.
leads were gold plated.
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
==Links==
* [[Media:Tek_component_news_num_273_aug_24_1979.pdf|Tek Component News No.273 August 1979 – Page 7 – IC socket problem update]]
==Pictures==
<gallery>
C95 dip socket-1.jpg|maintenance note for [[7D01]], C93 to C95 to "new C93" change
C95 dip socket-2.jpg|C95 DIP socket
C95 dip socket-3.jpg|C95 DIP socket contact structure
</gallery>
[[Category:Repair issues]]
[[Category:Repair issues]]

Revision as of 11:07, 24 March 2022

Texas Instruments made some bad IC sockets back in late 1970's. The TI C-95 model of socket is known to be a problem. A typical high quality replacement would be a Mill-Max machined-pin DIP socket.

DIP sockets are often problematic as instruments age. Gold-plated pins carrying low current in gold-plated sockets are the least problematic. Higher currents, such as occur in ECL logic, are more problematic.

For gold pin DIPs like many of the Tektronix custom ICs, one would choose a gold internal contact plating, and for other early non RoHS lead-tin plated ICs a similar internal contact plating is available from some suppliers.

Tek issued a service note (see below) that describes a transition from the original C93 socket design to a C95 design which was mechanically too fragile, and then a transition to an improved version of the C93 socket design.

For the 14 pin DIP at the left, a gold part number would be Mill-Max 110-93-314-41-001000, a non-RoHS lead-tin part number would be Mill-Max 110-99-314-41-001000. Both parts are non-RoHS since the solder-tail (PCB end) is also lead-tin plated.

Former Tek Bench Technician and Applications Engineer Jim Mauck says:

I noticed your article on bad Texas Instruments IC sockets. I literally replaced 100's of those sockets. I believe TI's part number was C95. They were used throughout Tek at the time but they do not always cause an issue. They didn't have a gas-tight contact with the IC pin and they would oxidize over time and develop a resistive connection. This wasn't necessarily a problem for low current applications but it was death to any ECL circuits. Unfortunately ECL was used extensively in logic analyzers. There were very high failure rates for the 7D01, DF1, and DF2 and eventually Tek had an unpublicized board exchange program for those instruments. Service technicians could replace the boards but there was no official modification kit or customer notification.

Failures due to these sockets were typically intermittent. A classic indicator of bad sockets was having the problem disappear if you wiggled all of the ICs in the socket. Doing that scraped off some of the oxidation and the instrument would work for another month or so until the contacts were again oxidized. The problem was exacerbated in some cases because Tek was using ICs with tinned leads intended to be soldered to the circuit board - not socketed. I never saw any problems in high current applications when the leads were gold plated.

Links

Pictures