Talk:2714: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Several of the spectrum analyzer articles qualify the bandwidth with the words "in coax". If the instrument only offers coax input, can we remove the words "in coax"?") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Several of the spectrum analyzer articles qualify the bandwidth with the words "in coax". | Several of the spectrum analyzer articles qualify the bandwidth with the words "in coax". | ||
If the instrument only offers coax input, can we remove the words "in coax"? | If the instrument only offers coax input, can we remove the words "in coax"? [[User:Kurt|Kurt]] ([[User talk:Kurt|talk]]) 13:17, 1 July 2019 (PDT) | ||
You're right Kurt. When I was working on other Spectrum Analyzers that offered both Coax and Waveguides I copied my file to start as a base and failed to remove "in coax" from the others. I'll fix them. --[[User:Jyohe|Jyohe]] ([[User talk:Jyohe|talk]]) 13:20, 1 July 2019 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:20, 1 July 2019
Several of the spectrum analyzer articles qualify the bandwidth with the words "in coax". If the instrument only offers coax input, can we remove the words "in coax"? Kurt (talk) 13:17, 1 July 2019 (PDT)
You're right Kurt. When I was working on other Spectrum Analyzers that offered both Coax and Waveguides I copied my file to start as a base and failed to remove "in coax" from the others. I'll fix them. --Jyohe (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2019 (PDT)