Talk:Ft doubler: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In my understanding the [[155-0078-00]] and [[155-0181-00]] do not qualify as ft doubler circuits. Here the crossover topology just form a regular Gilbert cell to adjust the gain (or invert the polarity) of the signal, but does not act to boost the bandwidth. I am not simple removing the links yet, also because the [[155-0181-00]] page even mentions its an ft-doubler (I believe incorrectly) and for future reference. [[User:Gregor|Gregor]] ([[User talk:Gregor|talk]]) 12:54, 2 Feb 2022 (CET) | In my understanding the [[155-0078-00]] and [[155-0181-00]] do not qualify as ft doubler circuits. Here the crossover topology just form a regular Gilbert cell to adjust the gain (or invert the polarity) of the signal, but does not act to boost the bandwidth. I am not simple removing the links yet, also because the [[155-0181-00]] page even mentions its an ft-doubler (I believe incorrectly) and for future reference. [[User:Gregor|Gregor]] ([[User talk:Gregor|talk]]) 12:54, 2 Feb 2022 (CET) | ||
Hi, I'd like to chat about it, if you have time. Maybe a video call to discuss? [[User:Kurt|Kurt]] ([[User talk:Kurt|talk]]) 08:26, 2 February 2022 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 08:26, 2 February 2022
I think that this page should be renamed "Transition frequency doubler" or "ft doubler".
In my understanding the 155-0078-00 and 155-0181-00 do not qualify as ft doubler circuits. Here the crossover topology just form a regular Gilbert cell to adjust the gain (or invert the polarity) of the signal, but does not act to boost the bandwidth. I am not simple removing the links yet, also because the 155-0181-00 page even mentions its an ft-doubler (I believe incorrectly) and for future reference. Gregor (talk) 12:54, 2 Feb 2022 (CET)
Hi, I'd like to chat about it, if you have time. Maybe a video call to discuss? Kurt (talk) 08:26, 2 February 2022 (PST)