Talk:549 remote control connector: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Since the [[012-0102-00]] does not cover all lines present on this connector, I am in favor of keeping it. Also, the same connector (!?) is used for a similar interface for the 7k series, and here there is also a separate page for it [[7000-series_remote_control_connector]] - so already from consistency I would keep it. | Since the [[012-0102-00]] does not cover all lines present on this connector, I am in favor of keeping it. Also, the same connector (!?) is used for a similar interface for the 7k series, and here there is also a separate page for it [[7000-series_remote_control_connector]] - so already from consistency I would keep it. | ||
[[User:Gregor|Gregor]] ([[User talk:Gregor|talk]]) 02:22, 8 April 2023 (PDT) | [[User:Gregor|Gregor]] ([[User talk:Gregor|talk]]) 02:22, 8 April 2023 (PDT) | ||
Okay, I'll leave it here, but I'll edit it to correct and clarify what the remote control actually does. | |||
[[User:Jadney|Jim Adney, Madison, WI]] ([[User talk:Jadney|talk]]) 09:48, 9 April 2023 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:48, 9 April 2023
Wouldn't it make more sense to include this as part of the remote control page? The pinout applies equally to both the plug and receptacle. That way, access is equally direct from both the 549 and the 564B. Jim Adney, Madison, WI (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2023 (PDT)
I also just noticed that this wiring list shows a connection to pin E, but there is no connection to E on the control. The control only has 3 pushbuttons, while 4 are called out on this list.
I would like to move everything on this page to the 012-0102-00 page and correct this error. Then this page could be deleted. (Yes, I realize this is the second delete I've recommended in 2 days. ;-) ) I'll do the moving if you give me permission. Jim Adney, Madison, WI (talk) 13:11, 7 April 2023 (PDT)
Since the 012-0102-00 does not cover all lines present on this connector, I am in favor of keeping it. Also, the same connector (!?) is used for a similar interface for the 7k series, and here there is also a separate page for it 7000-series_remote_control_connector - so already from consistency I would keep it. Gregor (talk) 02:22, 8 April 2023 (PDT)
Okay, I'll leave it here, but I'll edit it to correct and clarify what the remote control actually does. Jim Adney, Madison, WI (talk) 09:48, 9 April 2023 (PDT)