User talk:Kurt: Difference between revisions
m (→OK to extract encrypted PDF?: sig) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Author is maintenance script | Author is maintenance script | ||
[[ | |||
[[Media:070-2757-00.pdf]] | |||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
http://sqhill.com the domain exists but wants a login. | http://sqhill.com the domain exists but wants a login. | ||
[[User:Qfissler|Qfissler]] ([[User talk:Qfissler|talk]]) | [[User:Qfissler|Qfissler]] ([[User talk:Qfissler|talk]]) | ||
---- | |||
The manuals with the manoman.sqhill.com watermark were available for free download | |||
with no login or other restrictions. The scans seem to have been created with altruistic | |||
intentions, not for any sort of selfish gain. Somebody made a copy before the download links | |||
were shut down. OCRing the documents seems consistent with the intentions | |||
of the person who did the scanning, i.e., to make the information available, useful, etc. | |||
Removing the encryption so it can be OCRed seems fine to me. Peter, what do you think? | |||
[[User:Kurt|Kurt]] ([[User talk:Kurt|talk]]) 12:01, 28 May 2023 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:01, 28 May 2023
Hi Kurt, I think that's a 2430A input circuit board, certainly not a 2230A's.
Kind regards,
Raymond
Raymond, I'm not sure what you're referring to, but feel free to correct any errors you find. Kurt (talk) 07:02, 23 September 2020 (PDT)
OK to extract encrypted PDF?
I was pleased to see that we had the 465B Service Manual - but it has no OCR
I tried to OCR but it's protected with empty password
Is it OK for me to upload a replacement for this?
Author is maintenance script
but upload metadata and watermark in the PDF is a broken link
http://manoman.sqhill.com
http://sqhill.com the domain exists but wants a login. Qfissler (talk)
The manuals with the manoman.sqhill.com watermark were available for free download with no login or other restrictions. The scans seem to have been created with altruistic intentions, not for any sort of selfish gain. Somebody made a copy before the download links were shut down. OCRing the documents seems consistent with the intentions of the person who did the scanning, i.e., to make the information available, useful, etc. Removing the encryption so it can be OCRed seems fine to me. Peter, what do you think? Kurt (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2023 (PDT)