Talk:162: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The two "early" photos might show a non-Tek clone of a 162, which is also interesting. If so, we can add them to Category:Clones_of_Tektronix_instruments. ~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If so, we can add them to [[:Category:Clones_of_Tektronix_instruments]]. | If so, we can add them to [[:Category:Clones_of_Tektronix_instruments]]. | ||
[[User:Kurt|Kurt]] ([[User talk:Kurt|talk]]) 04:47, 3 April 2024 (PDT) | [[User:Kurt|Kurt]] ([[User talk:Kurt|talk]]) 04:47, 3 April 2024 (PDT) | ||
Oh, interesting! I found the pictures on Ebay, claiming it is Tektronix. It looks quite different to the version I know from Tekwiki, but since its a quite early product I have no clue how these units looked early on. So I simply dont know if they are genuine or not, the (German) ebay seller seems to belive that they are TEK. | |||
[[User:Gregor|Gregor]] ([[User talk:Gregor|talk]]) 08:41, 3 April 2024 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:41, 3 April 2024
The two "early" photos might show a non-Tek clone of a 162, which is also interesting. If so, we can add them to Category:Clones_of_Tektronix_instruments. Kurt (talk) 04:47, 3 April 2024 (PDT)
Oh, interesting! I found the pictures on Ebay, claiming it is Tektronix. It looks quite different to the version I know from Tekwiki, but since its a quite early product I have no clue how these units looked early on. So I simply dont know if they are genuine or not, the (German) ebay seller seems to belive that they are TEK. Gregor (talk) 08:41, 3 April 2024 (PDT)