7L5: Difference between revisions

2,062 bytes added ,  15 March
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 83: Line 83:
* [[L1-GC]]
* [[L1-GC]]
{{Documents|Link=7L5}}
{{Documents|Link=7L5}}
In [[Media:TekWeek (partial) October 10, 1975.pdf|TekWeek 10 Oct 1975]], [[Thor Hallen]] says
<blockquote>
''What is the Communications division doing to improve the reliability and field failure rates of high technology instruments such as the 7L5, 7L12 and 7L13 spectrumanalyzers?''
Glad you asked! High technology instruments such as the spectrum analyzers you mentioned pose enormous problems in maintaining Tektronix standards for high reliability.
Let’s consider the 7L5 for example. The 7L5 is the newest and most dense analyzer to date. It has approximately 2200 electrical parts packed into a two wide plug-in.
(The 7L12 and 7L13 are slightly less dense.) With such a high parts population, a 0.5%/year failure rate for individual parts would be disastrous.
In order to deliver better reliability, extraordinary steps are being implemented within the manufacturing area.
All benches have been covered with “pink poly” to make a static-free environment for the sensitive Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) circuits of the 7L5.
Assemblers and technicians are being trained in static handling of these devices.
The most embarrassing reliability problem that can occur is when the customer has an instrument failure within the first few hours of operation.
To prevent this, the 7L5 goes through an extensive 7 day cycled burn-in. Each day the instrument is checked for electrical performance.
Any failures are repaired and the burn-in is continued until the instrument has completed the 7 days.
Any failures in the last two days will cause the burn-in to continue until the instrument displays two consecutive days without a failure.
Along with burn-in and special handling, extensive effort is given to analysis of field and plant failures for reliability problems.
In answer to your question, we have only discussed the 7L5, but the [[7L12]] and [[7L13]] receive similar treatment.
There is no final solution to improved reliability. As instruments increase in complexity and reliability, challenge increases proportionately.
</blockquote>


==Prices==
==Prices==