Talk:T5032: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

Q: should we seperate T5031 Info out of T5032 Site ? Both is very similar, possible minor difference. I think, we should integrating T5031 into T5032-site, same with T5610 and T5611.

(Site note: T5032 is again successor for T5610 and is finally replaced by T5611. This fact know i now after reading of 6-7 paper manuals. But why is old type again successor for T5610, relaible or production problems?)

(Site note: T5032 is again successor for T5610 and is finally replaced by T5611. This fact know i now after reading of 6-7 paper manuals. But why is old type T5032 again successor for T5610, relaible or production problems?)

Revision as of 11:10, 18 December 2018 (view source) Matt (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:12, 18 December 2018 (view source) Matt (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Q: should we seperate T5031 Info out of T5032 Site ? Both is very similar, possible minor difference. I think, we should integrating T5031 into T5032-site, same with T5610 and T5611.		Q: should we seperate T5031 Info out of T5032 Site ? Both is very similar, possible minor difference. I think, we should integrating T5031 into T5032-site, same with T5610 and T5611.

	(Site note: T5032 is again successor for T5610 and is finally replaced by T5611. This fact know i now after reading of 6-7 paper manuals. But why is old type again successor for T5610, relaible or production problems?)		(Site note: T5032 is again successor for T5610 and is finally replaced by T5611. This fact know i now after reading of 6-7 paper manuals. But why is old type T5032 again successor for T5610, relaible or production problems?)

Talk:T5032: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu