32,195
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
The 7A11 was admittedly clumsy to use because of the probe size. It had some trouble dc drift with rf pickup at 5mV, 100mV and 2V/div. It was not very popular partially because it was expensive, $850 for single channel vs dual channel 7A12 (105MHz) at $700. But there was never another 1 megohm 7000 series plugin as fast as the 7A11...and it was one of the originals! | The 7A11 was admittedly clumsy to use because of the probe size. It had some trouble dc drift with rf pickup at 5mV, 100mV and 2V/div. It was not very popular partially because it was expensive, $850 for single channel vs dual channel [[7A12]] (105MHz) at $700. But there was never another 1 megohm 7000 series plugin as fast as the 7A11...and it was one of the originals! | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
The 7A16 (single channel plugin) was also 150MHz, but that was a year later. Then the 7904 came out in late 1971. That made the 7A11 a 250MHz plugin (for $950). The 7A16 was then 225MHz (for $625). The 7A16 disappeared rapidly and became the 7A16A, still 225MHz in 1973. | The [[7A16]] (single channel plugin) was also 150MHz, but that was a year later. Then the 7904 came out in late 1971. That made the 7A11 a 250MHz plugin (for $950). The 7A16 was then 225MHz (for $625). The 7A16 disappeared rapidly and became the 7A16A, still 225MHz in 1973. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
In 1972, the 485 came out with a 250MHz 1 megohm input. The 485 used a faster IC process ("SH2", 3.5GHz) but the 1 megohm to 50 ohm converter used only discrete devices. (See Electronics June, 1972) | In 1972, the [[485]] came out with a 250MHz 1 megohm input. The 485 used a faster IC process ("SH2", 3.5GHz) but the 1 megohm to 50 ohm converter used only discrete devices. (See Electronics June, 1972) | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
By 1974, the 7A11 cost $950 and the new, popular 7A26 (dual trace) was $1,050, not counting probes. But that would still only get you to 50mV/div with a (9.5pF, 3 foot, X10) probe, five years after the 7A11 introduction. Tom Rousseau designed the 7A26 which used the faster IC process and a vertical IC I designed for the 485. The 7A26 sold so well that Tektronix presented Tom with an entirely gold plated 7A26! Obviously, he still has it. | By 1974, the 7A11 cost $950 and the new, popular [[7A26]] (dual trace) was $1,050, not counting probes. But that would still only get you to 50mV/div with a (9.5pF, 3 foot, X10) probe, five years after the 7A11 introduction. Tom Rousseau designed the 7A26 which used the faster IC process and a vertical IC I designed for the 485. The 7A26 sold so well that Tektronix presented Tom with an entirely gold plated 7A26! Obviously, he still has it. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
But using that scheme, if the 7A11 went to 20V/div, it would have to stack three X10 attenuators inside the probe, making it a | But using that scheme, if the 7A11 went to 20V/div, it would have to stack three X10 attenuators inside the probe, making it a behemoth, and even if you did, that would still leave the X2 and X5 attenuations up to gain switching in the amplifier. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> |