User talk:Peter: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hello Peter,
Can you recall where you found this image:
[[file:Tek_5444.jpg]]
that you added to the [[5444]] page back in 2014?
http://w140.com/tekwiki/index.php?title=5444&oldid=11896
If you look closely, it shows a 5443/D44 combination that didn't appear in the annual catalogs. Identifying which catalog that came from would help clarify when the scope was apparently sold with that name between publication of the 1975 annual catalog and the Great Renaming of 5xxx scopes before the 1976 catalog.
Best regards,
-Paul
[[User:Pmc|Pmc]] ([[User talk:Pmc|talk]]) 12:22, 3 April 2019 (PDT)
----
Hi Peter!
Thank you for your flattering assessment of my photos.
As for the category. I also doubted if I should do it, but I took the final decision, noting that the T7912 (from 7912) had 2 links in subcategories before me.
If you really do everything according to your mind, then, it seems to me, it's best to make a link to the CRT list in general, and inside it already break down into types. In the end, rare magnetic deflections, storage tubes and tubes with distributed plates also deserve separate subcategories.
It, in principle, and done - the only trouble is that the tubes with the corresponding link in the subcategory are not automatically displayed in the corresponding section of the index table. And the subsections themselves are initially closed and open in a new window. It is not comfortable.
For example, I got a tube 154-xxxx-02, I do not know what type it is. Came to look in the index table and did not find it. And he was hidden in the subsection "storage", for example!
Again, for example, the T7912 is both scan-converter CRT, and with distributed plates. On good, it should be written in both subsections. And in the section itself, too, so it was more convenient to look for the part number.
Sincerely, Vladimir
----
Hi Peter, and thank you for the warm welcome.
Hi Peter, and thank you for the warm welcome.


Line 30: Line 61:


-Kurt
-Kurt
:I noticed that too but have no details, sorry. --[[User:Peter|Peter]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 14:12, 25 October 2016 (PDT)
----
Hello Peter,
<br>
Thank you for working on the processor pages, just wanted to mention that.
-Paul
--[[User:Floopy|Floopy]] ([[User talk:Floopy|talk]]) 07:44, 9 October 2020 (PDT)
1,323

edits

Navigation menu