897
edits
User talk:Rubasch: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Reply and revert re null suffix. +fix typo.
m (Reply and revert re null suffix. +fix typo.) |
|||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[7623]](A,B) || 100 || 4 || 1972 || 1992 || || || || class="t_as" | | | [[7623]](A,B) || 100 || 4 || 1972 || 1992 || || || || class="t_as" | || class="t_as" | || class="t_as" | || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | A || class="t_as" | B || class="t_as"| B | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[7623]] || 100 || 4 || 1972 || 1975 || || || || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | | | [[7623]] || 100 || 4 || 1972 || 1975 || || || || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | 1 || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | 1 || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | (-) || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | 1 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[R7623]] || 100 || 2 || 1973 || 1974 || || || || || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | 1 || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | 1 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | | [[R7623]] || 100 || 2 || 1973 || 1974 || || || || || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | 1 || style="background-color:Blue; color:Blue;" | 1 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
| Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
::: I also thought about combining scopes like the 7834--> 7934 but not sure if it still makes sense. Right now have not a lot of time for this. So everybody feel free to edit! --[[User:Rubasch|Rubasch]] ([[User talk:Rubasch|talk]]) 05:30, 19 October 2023 (PDT) | ::: I also thought about combining scopes like the 7834--> 7934 but not sure if it still makes sense. Right now have not a lot of time for this. So everybody feel free to edit! --[[User:Rubasch|Rubasch]] ([[User talk:Rubasch|talk]]) 05:30, 19 October 2023 (PDT) | ||
:::: We know from catalogs or announcements in ads, articles in TekScope etc. when new models came out. There is no comparable hard info on discontinuation - mostly this comes from models no longer appearing in catalogs. I think it is therefore not meaningful to infer from the model pages that there was any sort of overlap - at some time in 1991 you got a 7623B, whether there's a theoretical choice that you could have requested a 7623A as well is not substantiated by the information we have collected – therefore the box for the first year when the newer model came out would simply show that, i.e. 1991 shows "B". I also find the "(-)" symbol very awkward. The colored box says the model was available in that year, the fact that there is no suffix in that box says it's the base model. Thirdly, I would only combine suffixes, not different models. Just my opinion in the "keep it simple" spirit. --[[User:Peter|Peter]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 06:37, 19 October 2023 (PDT) | :::: We know from catalogs or announcements in ads, articles in TekScope etc. when new models came out. There is no comparable hard info on discontinuation - mostly this comes from models no longer appearing in catalogs. I think it is therefore not meaningful to infer from the model pages that there was any sort of overlap - at some time in 1991 you got a 7623B, whether there's a theoretical choice that you could have requested a 7623A as well is not substantiated by the information we have collected – therefore the box for the first year when the newer model came out would simply show that, i.e. 1991 shows "B". I also find the "(-)" symbol very awkward. The colored box says the model was available in that year, the fact that there is no suffix in that box says it's the base model. Thirdly, I would only combine suffixes, not different models. Just my opinion in the "keep it simple" spirit. --[[User:Peter|Peter]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 06:37, 19 October 2023 (PDT) | ||
::::: Thanks - yeah - I just chose a random thing - but your explanation makes it clear that we don't need to worry about that null suffix at all. [[User:Qfissler|Qfissler]] ([[User talk:Qfissler|talk]]) 07:04, 19 October 2023 (PDT) | |||
== P6015 refill with oil == | == P6015 refill with oil == | ||
| Line 205: | Line 206: | ||
Using only ceramic capacitor seems to increase the ringing. | Using only ceramic capacitor seems to increase the ringing. | ||
For soldering the capacitors into the compensation box a hi-power soldering iron is needed | For soldering the capacitors into the compensation box, a hi-power soldering iron is needed as some pins have to be soldered directly to the chassis. | ||
The modified P6015 is tested at 20 kV DC for 5 min. | The modified P6015 is tested at 20 kV DC for 5 min. | ||