709
edits
m (What do we mean by "reference" ?) |
m (clarify) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:: Ah - thanks Peter - that might explain something I spotted a few weeks ago. The [[564]] page includes info for the [[564B]] but there's a separate page... I was wondering when I saw it if things were just in flux and the some other edit might come along... | :: Ah - thanks Peter - that might explain something I spotted a few weeks ago. The [[564]] page includes info for the [[564B]] but there's a separate page... I was wondering when I saw it if things were just in flux and the some other edit might come along... | ||
:: If I understand correctly, we want the separate pages to help populate the references... Which references, exactly? | :: If I understand correctly, we want the separate pages to help populate the references... Which references, exactly? | ||
:: I'll search my edits as I seem to remember that I tried to demonstrate how useful the wiki is to someone and the model I searched for didn't show up in the search! I remember fixing that scenario for that model, but don't remember which it was :-) [[User:Qfissler|Qfissler]] ([[User talk:Qfissler|talk]]) 10:06, 30 April 2024 (PDT) | :: I'll search my edits as I seem to remember that I tried to demonstrate how useful the wiki is to someone and the model I searched for didn't show up in the search! I remember fixing that scenario for that model, but don't remember which it was :-) | ||
::... I think that the sort of thing we're trying to work around might be the boilerplate info - for instance: | |||
|introduced=1984 | |||
|discontinued=(?) | |||
:: Where we're often tempted to overload and mess it up: | |||
|introduced=1984 (other model 1988) | |||
|discontinued=(?) (other model 1999) | |||
:: Am I barking up the wrong tree? [[User:Qfissler|Qfissler]] ([[User talk:Qfissler|talk]]) 10:06, 30 April 2024 (PDT) |
edits