492: Difference between revisions

2,968 bytes added ,  15 March
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:


During the lifespan of the instrument, the specifications and included options were altered several times. A major upgrade was the introduction of the '''492A''' in 1987 which added marker functionality and resolution bandwidths and the '''492BP''' in 1989 which added a counter and increased the displayed dynamic range. The '''492PGM''' is a cost reduced version introduced in 1990. Also see [[49X Series Comparison]].
During the lifespan of the instrument, the specifications and included options were altered several times. A major upgrade was the introduction of the '''492A''' in 1987 which added marker functionality and resolution bandwidths and the '''492BP''' in 1989 which added a counter and increased the displayed dynamic range. The '''492PGM''' is a cost reduced version introduced in 1990. Also see [[49X Series Comparison]].
Regarding the 492, [[Linley Gumm]] says,
<blockquote>
Given how complicated it was,  many people contributed to the design. 
I currently have a list of 20 people. 
The problem is that I’m sure that I am missing several people and I hate to submit a list without them.
The 492 was designed at the request of the military. 
They asked for a modern replacement of the 491. 
It was required that it provide coaxial input coverage of the lower microwave bands (~18 GHz),
be very rugged, be a one person carry and fit through a submarine hatch. 
There was a lot more than that of course. 
When the 492 program started I was the project leader of the 7L18
and was still working to finish it off. 
The 7L18 was the first instrument at Tektronix to use a microprocessor. 
We had worked long and hard to learn how to electronically switch and control all the elements
that were controlled by physical switch closures in the earlier instruments. 
Understand that to position the frequency of a YIG filter correctly
with respect to the frequency of a YIG oscillator
one must generate very quiet DC voltages accurate to roughly 1 part in 20,000 (I.e. 1 MHz in 18 GHz),
so new control techniques were required. 
Plus the TEK made YIG filter designed for the 7L18 was therefore ready for use in the 492. 
We had also learned quite a number of things not to do and this was also used to anchor the 492 program. 
I say this to note that most of the long lasting, “classic”, Tektronix products were often the second,
but more often the third generation product by the same design group. 
The 492 was definitely a second generation product in its use of
microwave components and a microprocessor based control system;
perhaps a third if you lump the 7L12, 7L13 (microwave systems)
and the 7L5 (electronic bus control system) together as a first generation.
Larry Lockwood led the first part of the program. 
He defined the RF and microwave frequency conversion architecture of the 492. 
As the program progressed, Steve Morton became the project manager of the initial 492 program. 
Recognize that beyond that initial project,
follow-on design work went on for years as new features were added. 
Further, after their initial design work in the initial portion of the project,
designers often went on to do rather different subsystems in the follow-ons.
I worked on the 492 as a circuit designer in the initial design
and in several other roles later, none of which were leadership roles.
The other people I can recall having worked on the 492 at some point in its life were:
Roberto Alm,
Bob Bales,
Carlos Beck,
Bill Benedict,
Craig Bryant,
Russel Brown,
Wes Hayward,
David Leatherwood,
Gordon Long,
Dave Morton,
Bill Peterson,
David Shores,
Steve Skidmore,
Dennis Smith,
Phil Snow,
Leighton Whitset, and
Norman Witt.
Be aware my spelling is often “inventive”.  There are at least two other names I can’t bring to mind.
</blockquote>


{{BeginSpecs}}
{{BeginSpecs}}