39,764
edits
No edit summary |
(added internal links) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Regarding the 492, [[Linley Gumm]] says, | Regarding the 492, [[Linley Gumm]] says, | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Given how complicated it was, many people contributed to the design. | Given how complicated it was, many people contributed to the design. I currently have a list of 20 people. | ||
I currently have a list of 20 people. | |||
The problem is that I’m sure that I am missing several people and I hate to submit a list without them. | The problem is that I’m sure that I am missing several people and I hate to submit a list without them. | ||
The 492 was designed at the request of the military. | The 492 was designed at the request of the military. They asked for a modern replacement of the [[491]]. | ||
They asked for a modern replacement of the 491. | |||
It was required that it provide coaxial input coverage of the lower microwave bands (~18 GHz), | It was required that it provide coaxial input coverage of the lower microwave bands (~18 GHz), | ||
be very rugged, be a one person carry and fit through a submarine hatch. | be very rugged, be a one person carry and fit through a submarine hatch. | ||
There was a lot more than that of course. | There was a lot more than that of course. | ||
When the 492 program started I was the project leader of the 7L18 | |||
and was still working to finish it off. | When the 492 program started I was the project leader of the [[7L18]] and was still working to finish it off. | ||
The 7L18 was the first instrument at Tektronix to use a microprocessor. | The 7L18 was the first instrument at Tektronix to use a microprocessor. | ||
We had worked long and hard to learn how to electronically switch and control all the elements | We had worked long and hard to learn how to electronically switch and control all the elements that were controlled by physical switch closures in the earlier instruments. | ||
that were controlled by physical switch closures in the earlier instruments. | |||
Understand that to position the frequency of a YIG filter correctly | Understand that to position the frequency of a YIG filter correctly with respect to the frequency of a YIG oscillator | ||
with respect to the frequency of a YIG oscillator | one must generate very quiet DC voltages accurate to roughly 1 part in 20,000 (i.e. 1 MHz in 18 GHz), so new control techniques were required. | ||
one must generate very quiet DC voltages accurate to roughly 1 part in 20,000 ( | Plus the TEK-made YIG filter designed for the 7L18 was therefore ready for use in the 492. | ||
so new control techniques were required. | |||
Plus the TEK made YIG filter designed for the 7L18 was therefore ready for use in the 492. | |||
We had also learned quite a number of things not to do and this was also used to anchor the 492 program. | We had also learned quite a number of things not to do and this was also used to anchor the 492 program. | ||
I say this to note that most of the long lasting, “classic”, Tektronix products were often the second, | I say this to note that most of the long lasting, “classic”, Tektronix products were often the second, but more often the third generation product by the same design group. | ||
but more often the third generation product by the same design group. | The 492 was definitely a second generation product in its use of microwave components and a microprocessor based control system; | ||
The 492 was definitely a second generation product in its use of | perhaps a third if you lump the [[7L12]], [[7L13]] (microwave systems) and the [[7L5]] (electronic bus control system) together as a first generation. | ||
microwave components and a microprocessor based control system; | |||
perhaps a third if you lump the 7L12, 7L13 (microwave systems) | |||
and the 7L5 (electronic bus control system) together as a first generation. | |||
Larry Lockwood led the first part of the program. | [[Larry Lockwood]] led the first part of the program. He defined the RF and microwave frequency conversion architecture of the 492. | ||
He defined the RF and microwave frequency conversion architecture of the 492. | As the program progressed, [[Steve Morton]] became the project manager of the initial 492 program. | ||
As the program progressed, Steve Morton became the project manager of the initial 492 program. | Recognize that beyond that initial project, follow-on design work went on for years as new features were added. | ||
Recognize that beyond that initial project, | Further, after their initial design work in the initial portion of the project, designers often went on to do rather different subsystems in the follow-ons. | ||
follow-on design work went on for years as new features were added. | |||
Further, after their initial design work in the initial portion of the project, | |||
designers often went on to do rather different subsystems in the follow-ons. | |||
I worked on the 492 as a circuit designer in the initial design | I worked on the 492 as a circuit designer in the initial design and in several other roles later, none of which were leadership roles. | ||
and in several other roles later, none of which were leadership roles. | |||
The other people I can recall having worked on the 492 at some point in its life were: | The other people I can recall having worked on the 492 at some point in its life were: | ||
Roberto Alm, | [[Roberto Alm]], | ||
Bob Bales, | [[Bob Bales]], | ||
Carlos | [[Carlos Beeck]], | ||
Bill Benedict, | [[Bill Benedict]], | ||
Craig Bryant, | [[Craig Bryant]], | ||
Russel Brown, | [[Russel Brown]], | ||
Wes Hayward, | [[Wes Hayward]], | ||
David Leatherwood, | [[David Leatherwood]], | ||
Gordon Long, | [[Gordon Long]], | ||
Dave Morton, | [[Dave Morton]], | ||
Bill Peterson, | [[Bill Peterson]], | ||
David Shores, | [[David Shores]], | ||
Steve Skidmore, | [[Steve Skidmore]], | ||
Dennis Smith, | [[Dennis Smith]], | ||
Phil Snow, | [[Phil Snow]], | ||
Leighton Whitset, and | [[Leighton Whitset]], and | ||
Norman Witt. | [[Norman Witt]]. | ||
Be aware my spelling is often “inventive”. There are at least two other names I can’t bring to mind. | Be aware my spelling is often “inventive”. There are at least two other names I can’t bring to mind. |