Cam switches: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
[[Oliver Dalton]] recalls the decision to reduce the plug-in height as a traumatic one:
[[Oliver Dalton]] recalls the decision to reduce the plug-in height as a traumatic one:
"The decision set us back at least one year for the height decision required three major electro-mechanical component efforts in addition to the [[7000 series readout system|IC read-out effort]]: 1) [[back-lit switches|new lit push-buttons]] ... we needed 25 on a panel; 2) cam switches - these were Howard's ideas ... we needed them to be small and reasonably cheap; 3) [[miniature relays|relays]] ... we needed them to be small and reliable. We then largely had to make do with other available parts, like potentiometers.
"The decision set us back at least one year for the height decision required three major electro-mechanical component efforts in addition to the [[7000 series readout system|IC read-out effort]]: 1) [[back-lit switches|new lit push-buttons]] ... we needed 25 on a panel; 2) cam switches - these were Howard's ideas ... we needed them to be small and reasonably cheap; 3) [[miniature relays|relays]] ... we needed them to be small and reliable. We then largely had to make do with other available parts, like potentiometers.
[...]
Then Howard Vollum made the decision that Tek would develop its own switches, and [[Tony Sprando]], [[Bill Verhoof]], and Howard jointly developed the cam switch. The design ideas emerged from a "a lot of way-out brainstroming. "Howard played a key role by taking an "unlimited funds, the sky's the limit" attitude, while the other members would bring the ideas back to reality.
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Navigation menu