39,728
edits
Patent US 2883619A: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[John Kobbe]] said: | [[John Kobbe]] said: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Another anticipated problem with passive probe, we knew a signal bounced back and forth so we could not use the standard probe. | |||
While thinking about things to do like some damping resistors. Why not us a fine resistance wire as the center conductor. | While thinking about things to do like some damping resistors. Why not us a fine resistance wire as the center conductor. | ||
This time we really lucked out, it worked better than anticipated. It was even patent-able as was [[Patent US 2804571A|unblanking]] and [the] sweep circuit. | This time we really lucked out, it worked better than anticipated. It was even patent-able as was [[Patent US 2804571A|unblanking]] and [the] sweep circuit. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||