Patent US 2883619A: Difference between revisions

From TekWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
|Grant date=1959-04-21
|Grant date=1959-04-21
}}
}}
The 10th Tektronix patent, this is the famous invention of using lossy coax cable (a resistive center conductor) in a passive probe to dampen reflections and ringing.
[[John Kobbe]] said:
<blockquote>
"Another anticipated problem with passive probe, we knew a signal bounced back and forth so we could not use the standard probe.
While thinking about things to do like some damping resistors. Why not us a fine resistance wire as the center conductor.
This time we really lucked out, it worked better than anticipated. It was even patent-able as was [[Patent US 2804571A|unblanking]] and [the] sweep circuit."
</blockquote>
==See also==
* [https://w140.com/US2930986.pdf US2930986.pdf]
* [https://vintagetek.org/oscilliscope-patents/ Tek Stories: Oscilloscope Patents] by John Kobbe
* [http://dfad.com.au/links/THE%20SECRET%20WORLD%20OF%20PROBES%20OCt09.pdf Doug Ford, ''The Secret World of Oscilloscope Probes'']

Revision as of 14:22, 9 April 2022

Patent number US 2883619A (click link for details and documents via Google Patents)
Title Electrical probe
Inventors John Kobbe, Bill Polits
Company Tektronix Inc
Filing date 1956-02-29
Grant date 1959-04-21

Cited By:

Patent Title Inventors Assignee Granted
Patent US 3256484A High voltage test probe containing a part gas, part liquid dielectric fluid under pressure and having a transparent housing section for viewing the presence of the liquid therein Paul V Terry Tektronix Inc 1966-06-14

Related products:

Manufacturer Model Description Introduced Designers
Tektronix P410 10× passive probe 1955
Tektronix P6053 500 MHz, ×10, passive probe 1970
Tektronix P6053B 200 MHz, ×10, passive probe 1973

The 10th Tektronix patent, this is the famous invention of using lossy coax cable (a resistive center conductor) in a passive probe to dampen reflections and ringing.

John Kobbe said:

"Another anticipated problem with passive probe, we knew a signal bounced back and forth so we could not use the standard probe.

While thinking about things to do like some damping resistors. Why not us a fine resistance wire as the center conductor.

This time we really lucked out, it worked better than anticipated. It was even patent-able as was unblanking and [the] sweep circuit."

See also