User talk:Rubasch: Difference between revisions

From TekWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎AFG3021: new section)
Line 266: Line 266:
== AFG3021 ==
== AFG3021 ==


File:Tek AFG3021.jpg
 
[[File:Tektronix AFG30xx A70 CPU Board Replacement Kit.pdf|200px|thumb|left|AFG3021]]
[[File:Tektronix AFG3xxx Datasbheet.pdf|200px|thumb|left|AFG3021]]
[[File:Tek AFG3000 ServiceManual.pdf|200px|thumb|left|AFG3021]]
[[File:Tek AFG3021.jpg|200px|thumb|left|AFG3021]]
[[File:Tek AFG3021.jpg|200px|thumb|left|AFG3021]]

Revision as of 05:05, 31 October 2023

7000 Overview Table

Hi, I've extended the table a bit, what do you say?

Is writing speed in cm/μs not a cleaner spec than div/μs?
Can you add the digitizers please?
--Peter (talk) 08:11, 20 September 2023 (PDT)
  • Mostly I found div/µs, that's why I used it. but we can change it of course.
  • Done the digitizer. Kinda. Maybe they belong in another table with better fitting details (sample rate, resolution, etc.)
  • Barrytech said there is no R7704A http://www.barrytech.com/tektronix/tek7000/tekr7704.html. should we delete it?
checked in catalogs - the R7704 remained non-A and was available until 1985 -- Peter
  • about the 7603: what is "some" cooling? :-)
some models, as noted on the page --Peter
  • are you sure with the 7623B writing speed? should it not more like the 7633?
spec from 1991 catalog, p.68 --Peter
I love the table! I came here to mention that I have a 7704A with a cooling fan - but you also have the question re the 7603. The weirdest thing is that the 7704A service manual makes no mention of a fan! This led me down a bit of a rabbit hole of reading... I'd not be surprised if some 7603s had cooling fans. I thought that there might have been a period they tried some fans before Tek change from linear PSUs to the more efficient switching PSUs - I've found no data. Qfissler (talk) 12:24, 20 September 2023 (PDT)
I've condensed the writing speed columns into two less, and added some of the missing data from my notes. --Peter (talk) 10:12, 21 September 2023 (PDT)
Looks a lot better! Thank you for your effort. --Rubasch (talk) 00:07, 22 September 2023 (PDT)

On the page 7000-series scopes there are production dates for the digitizers. But there is no source for that information... --Rubasch (talk) 10:59, 22 September 2023 (PDT)


7000 Time Table

7000 time table
Scope Bandwith
[MHz]
Years of
Sales
Start
of Sales
End
of Sales
1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
7313 25 8 1972 1979 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7403N 65 6 1970 1975 1 1 1 1 1 1
R7403N 65 5 1971 1975 1 1 1 1 1
7503 90 3 1970 1972 1 1 1
7504 90 3 1969 1971 1 1 1
7514 90 5 1970 1974 1 1 1 1 1
7603 100 19 1972 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R7603 100 18 1973 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7613 100 19 1972 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R7613 100 18 1973 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7623(A,B) 100 4 1972 1992       A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A B B
7623 100 4 1972 1975 1 1 (-) 1
R7623 100 2 1973 1974 1 1
7623A 100 16 1975 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R7623A 100 17 1975 1991 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7623B 100 2 1991 1992 B B
R7623B 100 2 1991 1992 B B
7633 100 16 1975 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R7633 100 16 1975 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7704 150 4 1969 1972 1 1 1 1
R7704 150 16 1970 1985 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7704A 200 16 1972 1987 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7834 400 10 1977 1986 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7844 400 15 1974 1988 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R7844 400 18 1975 1992 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7854 400 11 1980 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7904 500 13 1971 1983 19,500 $ 1 1 1 20,300 $ 1 1 1 21,400 $ 1 1 1 1
R7903 500 9 1974 1982 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7904A 500 7 1984 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7934 500 4 1987 1990 1 1 1 1
7104 1000 13 1978 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R7103 1000 6 1985 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1
7D20 70 11 1982 1992 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7612D 90 9 1980 1988 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R7912 500 6 1973 1978 1 1 1 1 1 1
7912AD 500 10 1978 1987 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7912HB 750 3 1987 1989 1 1 1
P7001 175 9 1973 1981 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
No Storage
Analog Storage
Digital Storage
Dual Beam
Unknown

Quick edit in the table generator:

No Storage
Analog Storage
Digital Storage
Dual Beam
Unknown


What do think about condensing the information like in the example I have added above, 7623 (A,B)?

--Peter (talk) 03:36, 19 October 2023 (PDT)
I like it - but in that form, it loses a little bit of info where the 7623 with no suffix was available while the 7623A was also available - it's easy combining A and B by comma separating - but a null suffix... how would we show that? Hmmm - I tried (-) - just to show what I mean. Qfissler (talk) 04:48, 19 October 2023 (PDT)
I also thought about combining scopes like the 7834--> 7934 but not sure if it still makes sense. Right now have not a lot of time for this. So everybody feel free to edit! --Rubasch (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2023 (PDT)
We know from catalogs or announcements in ads, articles in TekScope etc. when new models came out. There is no comparable hard info on discontinuation - mostly this comes from models no longer appearing in catalogs. I think it is therefore not meaningful to infer from the model pages that there was any sort of overlap - at some time in 1991 you got a 7623B, whether there's a theoretical choice that you could have requested a 7623A as well is not substantiated by the information we have collected – therefore the box for the first year when the newer model came out would simply show that, i.e. 1991 shows "B". I also find the "(-)" symbol very awkward. The colored box says the model was available in that year, the fact that there is no suffix in that box says it's the base model. Thirdly, I would only combine suffixes, not different models. Just my opinion in the "keep it simple" spirit. --Peter (talk) 06:37, 19 October 2023 (PDT)
Thanks - yeah - I just chose a random thing - but your explanation makes it clear that we don't need to worry about that null suffix at all. Qfissler (talk) 07:04, 19 October 2023 (PDT)
Maybe also put the R-Versions in?
Strange. As soon as I put this comment to the article, one row loses it colours (only) in the preview --13:07, 19 October 2023 (PDT)
I think it's because that row uses CSS and fails in preview for me, too.Qfissler (talk) 15:24, 19 October 2023 (PDT)
My idea was something more like the 7904 (sorry for messing up the table). Then the sorting by year would make more sense: which was the most expensive device in that year. You could see how prices develop. Problem: I used the prices "2022 Dollar". this will be no use in a few years. AND its a lot of work. So, any guess how the table can be kept up to date with litle work? Greetings --Rubasch (talk) 07:37, 25 October 2023 (PDT)

P6015 refill with oil

R114 has an absolute permittivity/dielectric constant of ≈2 as a liquid and near 1 as a gas.

As a substitude for the R114 I used Shell-diala-s4-zx-i with a dielectric constant of 2.

The diala oil has a high break down voltage of 70 kV, is enviroment friendly, not corrosive and cheap.
Drinking the oil is deadly, because it will creap into the lung!

Disasembling the probe body:

  • The resistor should never be touched
  • the resistor is plugged in and can be pulled out
  • The "golden cap" (resistor end cap) is screwed in. Use a big phillips screwdriver, put some cloth around it so no edges poke out, press it gently into the cap and turn. Be carefull!

The Probe body is modified as follow:

  • cleaned in ultrasonic bath (every printing on the device will disapear!)
  • cleaned with isopropanol
  • airfree filled with oil

Asembling the probe body:

  • put everything together (gold cap, resistor)
  • hold the probe body upright
  • put the sealing ring on top of the probe body
  • fill the probe body until the oil spills over the sealing ring
  • put the probe togehter
  • clean up the mess

The compensation box is modified as follow:

  • C1: 47 pF ceramic/polystyrene capacitor parallel
  • C2: 220 pF ceramic/polystyrene capacitor parallel
  • C3: 100 pF polystyrene capacitor parallel

Compensation:

  • follow the rules in the manual
  • the probe cable should be stretched out, because it has an importend influence on the first 100 ns

As a rule:

  • if you can't tight C1/C2/C3 not as hard as you need for compensation: you need more capacity.
  • if you can't loose C1/C2/C3 not as much as you need for compensation: you have too much capacity.

Using only ceramic capacitor seems to increase the ringing.

For soldering the capacitors into the compensation box, a hi-power soldering iron is needed as some pins have to be soldered directly to the chassis.

The modified P6015 is tested at 20 kV DC for 5 min.


oszillograms:

empty (1000 V peak) oil filled without compensation (100 V peak) oil filled with compensation (1000 V peak)
50 ns / div
100  μs / div
no file
1 ms / div

Test are done with a natronic KHT1000D probe calibrator.

This is great, thanks! I had a quick look and only found 20 liter cans as the smallest order unit, do you have a source for less (group purchase - Europe?)
--Peter (talk) 03:36, 19 October 2023 (PDT)
It took me some time to figure out the right solution. At my company we bought 50 l. I use that. For someone living next to Berlin I can give a refill ;-) sending it to the US will be to expensive, I think. Giving away 1-2 l should be OK, so if some people get together, I can help. On the other hand, many other oils should be usefull, I just haven't tested them. Greetings, --Rubasch (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2023 (PDT)

AFG3021

AFG3021
AFG3021
AFG3021
AFG3021