7A12: Difference between revisions

From TekWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
The [[7A12]] uses the [[155-0032-00]] custom IC as a gain stage and the [[155-0022-00]] for channel switching.
The [[7A12]] uses the [[155-0032-00]] custom IC as a gain stage and the [[155-0022-00]] for channel switching.


[[John Addis]] writes: "There were two mistakes, concept errors, that doomed the [[7A12]] from day one.  The first was in deciding to use the 1 GHz F<sub>T</sub> Tektronix IC process (called 50/450 for resistivities of the two base layers) for the signal path.  This process was Tektronix' fastest but too slow for a plugin expected to provide 150 MHz bandwidth in the fastest original mainframe, the [[7704]]. At the time, HP had a 2.5 GHz process used in the 1830A, 250MHz plugin.
[[John Addis]] writes: "There were two mistakes, conceptual errors, that doomed the [[7A12]] from 'day one'.  The first was in deciding to use the 1 GHz F<sub>T</sub> Tektronix IC process (called 50/450 for resistivities of the two base layers) for the signal path.  This process was Tektronix' fastest but too slow for a plugin expected to provide 150 MHz bandwidth in the fastest original mainframe, the [[7704]]. At the same time, HP had a 2.5 GHz process used in the 1830A, 250MHz, dual channel 50 ohm only plugin.


"The second day one mistake, later pointed out by [[Tom Rousseau]], was to arrange the two channels side by side.  Roy wanted to be able to go from one sensitivity (deflection factor) to another without having to go through all the sensitivities in between as happens with a rotary switch.  The vertical row of push buttons was functionally attractive.  However, that would require both channels to occupy the same space if on a single, centered, vertical circuit board.  
"The second 'day one' mistake, later pointed out by [[Tom Rousseau]], was to arrange the two channels side by side.  Roy wanted to be able to go from one sensitivity (deflection factor) to another without having to go through all the sensitivities in between as happens with a rotary switch.  The vertical row of push buttons was functionally attractive.  However, that would require both channels to occupy the same space if on a single, centered, vertical circuit board.  


The solution was two separate, mirror image attenuator (V/Div) boards, and two mirror image push button V/division selection boards. There was the essential Main center board which connects signal and power to a socket in the mainframe. There were also two identical amplifier boards that took clever advantage of an asymmetrical output. To make matters worse, the two attenuator boards were made with PPO (polyphenylene oxide), an expensive low dielectric constant material to keep the input capacitance low. There were 11 circuit boards, nine of them unique.  All of this was obviously extremely expensive.
"The solution was two separate, mirror image attenuator (V/Div) boards, and two mirror image push button V/division selection boards. There was the essential Main center board which connects signal and power to a socket in the mainframe. There were also two identical amplifier boards that took clever advantage of an asymmetrical output. To make matters worse, the two attenuator boards were made with PPO (polyphenylene oxide), an expensive low dielectric constant material to keep the input capacitance low. There were 11 circuit boards, nine of them unique.  All of this was obviously extremely expensive.


"As part of the 7403 program to bring a low cost entry product into the 7K series of plugins, Tom Rousseau was assigned to design a new dual trace plugin. Realizing the 7A12's problems, Tom put one channel physically above the other. Almost all of this was done on a single circuit board.  It had only 80 MHz bandwidth but was much less expensive to manufacture. The design was classical, had none of the complicated offset circuitry, and the channel switch was the same venerable 155-0022-00 used in the 7A12. It became the [[7A18]]."   
"As part of the 7403 program to bring a low cost entry product into the 7K series of plugins, Tom Rousseau was assigned to design a new dual trace plugin. Realizing the 7A12's problems, Tom put one channel physically above the other. Almost all of this was done on a single circuit board.  The plugin had only 80 MHz bandwidth but was much less expensive to manufacture. The design was classical, had none of the complicated offset circuitry, and the channel switch was the same venerable 155-0022-00 used in the 7A12. The expensive PPO circuit board material was still necessary, but Tom used a cam switch, less expensive than Tek relays to select the deflection factor (sensitivity).  It became the [[7A18]]."   


[[Tom Rousseau]] writes: "After the 7A18 project, and becoming familiar with the [[M84]] (155-0078-xx) IC, I conjured up the 7A26 concept based on the general layout of the 7A18.  I figured that with the [[M84]], I could more than double the bandwidth of the 7A18 and provide a reasonably higher bandwidth, 1 megohm dual trace plug-in.  Furthermore, I offered the possibility of making four vertical plug-ins from one basic design: [[7A26]], [[7A24]] (50 ohm), [[7A16A]] (1 megohm, single channel) and a fourth not pursued, 7Axx, single channel, 50 Ohm.  I worked on this for awhile then popped the idea to management ([[Oliver Dalton]]), who agreed to three of the plug-ins."  
[[Tom Rousseau]] writes: "After the 7A18 project, and becoming familiar with the [[M84]] (155-0078-xx) IC, I conjured up the 7A26 concept based on the general layout of the 7A18.  I figured that with the [[M84]], I could more than double the bandwidth of the 7A18 and provide a reasonably higher bandwidth, 1 megohm dual trace plug-in.  Furthermore, I offered the possibility of making four vertical plug-ins from one basic design: [[7A26]], [[7A24]] (50 ohm), [[7A16A]] (1 megohm, single channel) and a fourth not pursued, 7Axx, single channel, 50 Ohm.  I worked on this for awhile then popped the idea to management ([[Oliver Dalton]]), who agreed to three of the plug-ins."  

Latest revision as of 11:38, 14 October 2024

Tektronix 7A12
120 MHz dual-channel amplifier
7A12 front view

Compatible with 7000-series scopes

Produced from 1969 to 1974

Manuals

Alternate

(All manuals in PDF format unless noted otherwise)
Manuals – Specifications – Links – Pictures

The Tektronix 7A12 is a 120 MHz dual-trace vertical plug-in for 7000-series scopes. This original 7000-series plugin allows large dc offset voltages, however the offset voltage is not available on the front panel to be measured externally as with the 7A11.

Switches on the front panel control miniature relays in the signal path to select input attenuators, through logic circuits.

The 7A12 was designed by Roy Hayes (who also designed the 3A3 and 3A8 before leaving for HP Loveland in Jan 1971). The Evaluation Engineer for the 7A12 was Peter Starič, co-author of the book "Wideband Amplifiers" with Erik Margan. Peter and his daughter, Zorana, returned to Ljubljana on August 4, 1970.

Key Specifications

Bandwidth 120 MHz (79xx) / 105 MHz (77xx) / 55 MHz (74xx)
Deflection 5 mV/Div to 5 V/Div (1–2–5), variable up to 12.5 V/Div
Input impedance 1 MΩ // 24 pF
Timing Delay difference between channels < 500 ps
Channel isolation At least 3000:1 at 75 MHz
Maximum input 350 V DC + Peak AC at 1 kHz or less
DC offset At least ±500 divisions

Internals

The 7A12 uses the 155-0032-00 custom IC as a gain stage and the 155-0022-00 for channel switching.

John Addis writes: "There were two mistakes, conceptual errors, that doomed the 7A12 from 'day one'. The first was in deciding to use the 1 GHz FT Tektronix IC process (called 50/450 for resistivities of the two base layers) for the signal path. This process was Tektronix' fastest but too slow for a plugin expected to provide 150 MHz bandwidth in the fastest original mainframe, the 7704. At the same time, HP had a 2.5 GHz process used in the 1830A, 250MHz, dual channel 50 ohm only plugin.

"The second 'day one' mistake, later pointed out by Tom Rousseau, was to arrange the two channels side by side. Roy wanted to be able to go from one sensitivity (deflection factor) to another without having to go through all the sensitivities in between as happens with a rotary switch. The vertical row of push buttons was functionally attractive. However, that would require both channels to occupy the same space if on a single, centered, vertical circuit board.

"The solution was two separate, mirror image attenuator (V/Div) boards, and two mirror image push button V/division selection boards. There was the essential Main center board which connects signal and power to a socket in the mainframe. There were also two identical amplifier boards that took clever advantage of an asymmetrical output. To make matters worse, the two attenuator boards were made with PPO (polyphenylene oxide), an expensive low dielectric constant material to keep the input capacitance low. There were 11 circuit boards, nine of them unique. All of this was obviously extremely expensive.

"As part of the 7403 program to bring a low cost entry product into the 7K series of plugins, Tom Rousseau was assigned to design a new dual trace plugin. Realizing the 7A12's problems, Tom put one channel physically above the other. Almost all of this was done on a single circuit board. The plugin had only 80 MHz bandwidth but was much less expensive to manufacture. The design was classical, had none of the complicated offset circuitry, and the channel switch was the same venerable 155-0022-00 used in the 7A12. The expensive PPO circuit board material was still necessary, but Tom used a cam switch, less expensive than Tek relays to select the deflection factor (sensitivity). It became the 7A18."

Tom Rousseau writes: "After the 7A18 project, and becoming familiar with the M84 (155-0078-xx) IC, I conjured up the 7A26 concept based on the general layout of the 7A18. I figured that with the M84, I could more than double the bandwidth of the 7A18 and provide a reasonably higher bandwidth, 1 megohm dual trace plug-in. Furthermore, I offered the possibility of making four vertical plug-ins from one basic design: 7A26, 7A24 (50 ohm), 7A16A (1 megohm, single channel) and a fourth not pursued, 7Axx, single channel, 50 Ohm. I worked on this for awhile then popped the idea to management (Oliver Dalton), who agreed to three of the plug-ins."

The 7A26 became the best selling Tektronix plugin of all time. Tektronix literally gold plated a 7A26 and gave it to Tom in recognition.

See https://vintagetek.org/100000-7a26-plug-in/

Links

Documents Referencing 7A12

Document Class Title Authors Year Links
Tekscope 1969 V1 N5 Oct 1969.pdf Article Introducing the New Generation 1969
Tekscope 1969 V1 N6 Dec 1969.pdf Article A New Logic for Oscilloscope Displays 1969
7000 series brochure March 1973.pdf Brochure 7000 series brochure, March 1973 1973

Pictures

Components

Some Parts Used in the 7A12

Part Part Number(s) Class Description Used in
148-0034-01 148-0034-01 Discrete component miniature DPDT relay 485 7A12
148-0034-02 148-0034-02 Discrete component miniature DPDT relay 7A12
155-0022-00 155-0022-00 155-0022-01 Monolithic integrated circuit analog multiplexer 147 148 149 335 468 1430 1441 1461 1900 1910 2220 2221 2230 5223 5403 5440 5441 5443 5444 5A38 7313 7403N 7503 7504 7514 7603 AN/USM-281C 7613 7623 7623A 7633 7704 R7704 7704A 7834 7844 7854 R7912 7912AD 7912HB 7904 R7903 7904A 7934 7A12 7A18 7A18A 7A18N 7B52 7B53N 7D10 7D11 7D12 NT-7000 P7001
155-0032-00 155-0032-00 155-0032-01 Monolithic integrated circuit variable-gain transconductance amplifier (voltage in, current out) 335 464 465 465B 466 475 475A 475M 634 650 651 652 653 655 656 670 671 7A12 475 FG504 1440 1460 1480 1481 1482 1485